
Damien Hirst was born in Bristol, but grew up in Leeds. His father left when Hirst was 12 years old and Hirst’s mother struggled to deal with his out of control behaviour. He was arrested twice for stealing. Hirst had a strained relationship with his mother, saying she could not tolerate his rebellion. She apparently heated his Sex Pistols LP on the stove to make a fruit bowl. She did, however, encourage his liking for drawing. Hirst went to Leeds College of Art and Design, he worked for two years on building sites, then studied Fine Art at Goldsmiths, University of London (1986–89). He also had a placement in a mortuary, which has very obviously influenced his work. In the 1990s Hirst struggled with addiction to cocaine and drink.
I think most people in today’s Britain are aware of who Damien Hirst is. When you read about him he seems like a bit of a wanker.
He is very protective of his work and the copyright. In 1994 Hirst curated the exhibition ‘Some Went Mad, Some Ran Away’ at the Serpentine Gallery – London, Hirst exhibited ‘Away from the Flock’ which was a sheep in a tank of formaldehyde.

Later an artist from Oxford Mark Bridger poured black ink into it and retitled the piece ‘Black Sheep’. He was prosecuted, at Hirst’s request and was given two years of probation. The sculpture was thereafter restored at a cost of £1000. Hirst himself is involved in a lot of controversy about the originality of some of his works. Hirst was sued in 2000 for breach of copyright over his sculpture, ‘Hymn’, a 20 foot, six ton, enlargement of his son Connor’s 14″ Young Scientist Anatomy Set, designed by Norman Emms, which are produced by toy manufacturer Humbrol for £14.99 each. Hirst had to give money to children’s charity in an out-of-court settlement. In 2007, artist John LeKay said he had given Hirst a copy of a Carolina Biological Supply Company catalogue in the early 1990s, LeKay added:
“You have no idea how much he got from this catalogue. The Cow Divided is on page 647 – it is a model of a cow divided down the centre, just like Hirst’s piece.” Which is the work Hirst won a Turner Prize for in 1995.

Hirst also exhibited in the Saatchi ‘Sensation’ exhibition. He became closely linked with Charles Saatchi, who bought the majority of Hirst’s work. After the Saatchi years, 1991 – 2003, Hirst’s relationship with Saatchi broke down and they parted ways in 2004.
I feel that Hirst’s most interesting work is his newest one, ‘For the love of God’, which made Hirst the most expensive living artist. The work was sold for a massive £50 million.

In the making of it, done by Hirst’s many assistants, so many of the same karat diamond were used that the world supply almost ran out. It is an extremely eerie work, the contrast between the beautiful diamonds and the human teeth. In fact it’s the mouth that makes it, without that it loses it’s human quality and in turn its morbidity.
Sources:
Web:
Wikipedia – Damien Hirst
tate.org.uk – Damien Hirst/Turner Prize











5 comments
Comments feed for this article
February 15, 2008 at 6:10 pm
Georgia
The stuff you said about ‘For The Love Of God’ – is that you’re opinion or did you read it somewhere? I don’t understand how you can talk about this work and only point out the obvious aesthetics. What do you think about the fact that this is the most expensive piece of art ever made but part of his message was about how todays society waste money/have too much money? Or it could be about conflict diamons. Or… I don’t know… almost anything. This piece works on so many levels and is disgusting on so many levels.
We were having a group discussion at my uni, and a tutor asked the quesiton, “who would you say is a genius that is alive today?”. The room was silent for a while, and Damien Hirst actually did pass through my head. Then someone said Damien Hirst. Would any of us have thought this before he did this huge (perhaps attention-seeking) piece? All that aside, I do think he is a very good artist, and am glad to see that someone has reached such success while still living.
February 16, 2008 at 2:17 pm
sofiefr
Of course it’s my opinion. I think I did make it quite clear that I think he is one lucky wanker. Plus I had went over my word limit so no more writing about the skull. But I don’t find it particularly disgusting, I don’t think it is a waste either. There are worse things to waste your money on. Smack anyone? Of course there are also many other better things that the money could have been spent on, but I don’t think Hirst is one for charity (unless of course he gets sued).
Hirst actually made a point of not using conflict/blood diamonds in this piece.
February 16, 2008 at 6:58 pm
Georgia
Ah, I see. Yeah, I know he didn’t USE conflict diamonds, but out of the many statements he could be making, something to do with conflict diamonds could have been one of them.
Anyway, sorry if it seemed like I attacked you, it’s just so refreshing to get to talk about this stuff on the net. I’m gonna check your blog often.
February 21, 2008 at 9:37 pm
Paula
My partner and I got really ill at the thought of all the money that could have fed a small country , although the diamonds may not have been blood diomonds they must have created a lacking in the market , upping the price of diamonds , promoting other people to buy blood diamonds , we are making a homage peice , a glass encrusted bum , we would be happy to advertise pictures when its finished .
February 21, 2008 at 9:46 pm
sofiefr
True. There are worse people who spend that much money on worse things. But yeah take it up with Hirst, not me.
Your piece sounds interesting. Post a photo when you finish.